Lopez v. Chula Vista Police Department et al

Plaintiff: Sergio Lopez
Defendant: Chula Vista Police Department, The City of Chula Vista, Richard Emerson, D. Clark, G. Armstrong, D. Martinez, Guthrie, Forbes and Does 1-20
Case Number: 3:2007cv01272
Filed: July 13, 2007
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: William Q. Hayes
Referring Judge: Barbara Lynn Major
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 18, 2010 116 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: (1) Plaintiff's (Doc. 83 ) Motion in Limine to exclude William Lewinski is granted in part and denied in part. This ruling is without prejudice to renew at trial. Plaintiff's (Doc. 83 ) Motion in Limine to exclude Dale Bourgeois is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's (Doc. 83 ) Motion in Limine to exclude Elmer Pellegrino is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's (Doc. 83 ) Motion in Limine to exclude Dr. Kalish is deferred until the conclusion of Plaintiff's case in chief. The parties shall not reference Dr. Kalish during opening statements. Plaintiff's (Doc. 82 ) Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding False Credentials is granted without prejudice. Defendants' (Doc. 76 ) Motion in L imine No. 1 is denied without prejudice. Prior to referencing or eliciting evidence of any incidents which fall within the scope of Defendants' Motion in Limine No. 1, Plaintiff shall bring the matter to the Court's attention outside the pr esence of the jury. If Plaintiff intends to introduce any evidence which he contends is admissible pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b), Plaintiff must file a memorandum detailing the evidence and specifying the purpose for which the evidence will be sought to be admitted. This memorandum must be filed no later than 2/19/2010 at 05:00 PM. Defendants' (Doc. 77 ) Motion in Limine No. 2 is granted. Defendants' (Doc. 78 ) Motion in Limine No. 3 is denied without prejudice. Defenda nts' (Doc. 79 ) Motion in Limine No. 4 is granted in part and denied in part. This ruling is without prejudice to renew at trial. Defendants' (Doc. 81 ) Motion in Limine No. 5 is granted in part and denied in part. This ruling is without prejudice to renew at trial. Defendants' (Doc. 80 ) Motion in Limine No. 6 is granted. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 2/18/2010. (mdc) (jrl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lopez v. Chula Vista Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sergio Lopez
Represented By: Eugene G Iredale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chula Vista Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of Chula Vista
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Emerson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G. Armstrong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Guthrie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Forbes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?