Vallery v. Brown et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 14, 2012
ORDER overruling Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Discovery Orders and denying his 128 Motion to postpone Summary Judgement proceedings. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 2/14/12. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lao)
|November 23, 2011
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 110 Motion for Discovery-related relief. The Defendants are to serve Vallery with supplemental responses to document requests, and, where appropriate, include statements under oath no late r than December 2, 2011. (Motion hearing set for 1/9/2012 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks.) Plaintiff may file a comprehensive supplemental opposition by December 15, 2011. The Defendants may reply to Vallery's Opposition (ECF No. 79 ) and any supplemental opposition by December 30, 2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 11/23/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lao)
|October 7, 2011
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's Doc. 69 Motion to Compel Disclosure and Cooperation in Discovery. Motion Hearing for Summary Judgment is currently set for 11/21/2011 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks. Reply due by 11/11/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 10/6/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)
|June 23, 2011
ORDER denying 65 Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 6/23/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lao)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?