Walters v. Sisto

Petitioner: Martin Edward Walters
Respondent: D K Sisto
Case Number: 3:2008cv00167
Filed: January 31, 2008
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Dana M. Sabraw
Referring Judge: Nita L. Stormes
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 13, 2009 34 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 30 Request for Certificate of Appealability. The Court finds Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find this Court's denial of the petition debatable. Therefore, Petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 3/13/2009. (cc: US Court of Appeals). (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service). (akr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walters v. Sisto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Martin Edward Walters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D K Sisto
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?