Kiskila et al v. United States of America
Ronal J. Kiskila and Donna E. Kiskila |
United States of America |
3:2008cv01032 |
June 10, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice Office |
San Diego |
Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
Jeffrey T. Miller |
None |
U.S. Government Defendant |
28:1346 Tort Claim |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER following Mandatory Settlement Conference, extending certain pretrial dates. On June 22, 2009, the Court held a Mandatory Settlement Conference. Defendants ex parte motion to compel Plaintiff's attendance at defense medical examination is granted in part and denied in part 20 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 6/24/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(tkl) (jrl). |
Filing 19 ORDER granting 18 joint Motion to extend pretrial dates. Trial set for 3/1/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 16 before Judge Jeffrey T. Miller. Pretrial Conference set for 1/29/2010 08:30 AM in Courtroom 16 before Judge Jeffrey T. Miller. Settlement C onference set for 6/22/2009 02:00 PM in Courtroom E before Magistrate Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo. Memo of Contentions of Fact and Law by 12/21/09; Proposed Pretrial Order by 1/20/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 5/12/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(tkl)(jrl). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.