Hansen Beverage Company v. Innovation Ventures, LLC
| Hansen Beverage Company |
| Innovation Ventures, LLC |
| 3:2008cv01166 |
| July 1, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Trademark Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Louisa S Porter |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
234
ORDER regarding 232 Joint Discovery Statement re: August 10, 2010 Discovery Conference. Defendant's requests are Granted in part and Denied in part. No later than 08/23/10, Hansen is ordered to both inquire if unredacted copies exist and if s o, provide them to the Court for review. If Plaintiff has previously produced all consumer complaints, it must so state in a sworn declaration. Plaintiff must provide a response or declaration on or before 08/23/10. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 8/16/10.(lao)
|
|
Filing
231
ORDER Regarding Hansen Beverage Company's 218 Objection to Magistrate Judge Gallo's Order Denying Request to Depose Dr. Gail Mahady. Court declines to modify or set aside Magistrate Judge Gallo's denial of Hansen's request to depose Dr. Mahady. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 4/20/2010.(jah)
|
|
Filing
219
ORDER Confirming Denial of Hansen's Request re 212 Supplemental Briefing, 194 Notice (Other), 200 Reply. Hansen's request to depose Dr. Gail Mahady is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 3/22/2010.(jah) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
203
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 173 Motion for Certification for Inrerlocutory Appeal. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 2/25/2010. (jah) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 174 Ex Parte Motion for a Limited Stay. Court will take Plaintff's motion for certification under submission pursuant to Civil Local rule 7.1.(d)(1). No oral argument will be required. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 1/19/2010. (jah) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER Approving Agreements Made at Discovery Conferences Dated 5/26/2009 and 7/1/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter on 8/5/2009. (jah) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER granting w/o prejudice Third-Party Carryon Communications' 67 Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum. Dft may subpoena Carryon Communications once it has completed further discovery from Pla and/or narrowed the scope of its requests. Signed by Magistrate Judge Louisa S. Porter on 7/1/2009. (jah)(jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hansen Beverage Company v. Innovation Ventures, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hansen Beverage Company | |
| Represented By: | Norman Leslie Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Innovation Ventures, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
