Jackson v. Knight

Plaintiff: James Morris Jackson
Defendant: Stephen E Knight
Case Number: 3:2008cv01484
Filed: October 29, 2008
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Marilyn L. Huff
Referring Judge: Barbara Lynn Major
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 11, 2009 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 19 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on Appeal. The Court determines that this appeal is not taken in good faith. Therefore, the Court denies Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 2/11/2009. (cc: US Court of Appeals). (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service). (akr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Knight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Morris Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen E Knight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?