Cordeiro v. Hernandez et al

Case Number: 3:2008cv01519
Filed: August 18, 2008
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
Referring Judge: Cathy Ann Bencivengo
Presiding Judge: Marilyn L. Huff
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 26, 2010 37 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Denying 31 Motion to Dismiss and denying without prejudice 35 Motion to Issue an Order Preventing Prison Interference with Legal Mail. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 01/25/2010.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag) (jrl).
April 17, 2009 26 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: denying 8 Motion to Dismiss, denying as moot 12 Motion to Stay and denying as moot 25 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Robert J Hernandez answer due 6/17/2009 and Edmund Gerald Brown, Jr answer due 6/17/2009. Traverse due by 7/17/2009. The Court refers the case to the magistrate judge for a report and recommendation on the merits. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 4/17/09. (ag) Modified on 4/20/2009 to add to text (ag). (jrl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cordeiro v. Hernandez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?