ACCO Brands USA LLC v. Sorensen

Plaintiff: ACCO Brands USA LLC
Defendant: Jens E. Sorensen
Case Number: 3:2008cv01670
Filed: September 12, 2008
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: Patent Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Cathy Ann Bencivengo
Presiding Judge: Barry Ted Moskowitz
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 24, 2011 103 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Re 82 Motion to Strike and Partial Judgment on the Pleadings. Sorensen's motion to strike is granted, Acco is granted leave to amend, and Sorensen's motion for partial judgment on the pleadings is denied. The Court strikes the Third Affirmative Defense without prejudice. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 2/24/11. (jer)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ACCO Brands USA LLC v. Sorensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ACCO Brands USA LLC
Represented By: Michael D Fabiano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jens E. Sorensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?