Bratton v. Hernandez et al
Henry R Bratton, III |
Robert Hernandez and Jerry Brown |
3:2008cv01932 |
October 20, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
San Diego |
Ruben B. Brooks |
William Q. Hayes |
None |
Federal Question |
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9 ) is adopted in its entirety, and the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4 ) is granted and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is denied. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Respondent. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 7/28/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc) (av1). |
Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Of United States Magistrate Judge Re: Granting Motion To Dismiss (Doc. 4 ) And Dismissing Petition, And ORDER Denying Request For Evidentiary Hearing: It is recommended that the Court issue an Order (1) approving and adopti ng this Report and Recommendation, (2) directing that Judgment be entered granting Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, and (3) dismissing the Petition. Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is denied. Objections to R&R due by 7/13/2009. Replies due by 7/27/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 6/11/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc) (jrl). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.