Fractional Villas, Inc. v. Windsor Capital Mortgage Corp. et al
| Fractional Villas, Inc. |
| Windsor Capital Mortgage Corp. and Does 1-25 |
| 3:2008cv02076 |
| November 12, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Copyright Office |
| San Diego |
| Anthony J. Battaglia |
| Jeffrey T. Miller |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 17:101 Copyright Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER granting motion for extension of time for Defendant Linda Temko to respond to the First Amended Complaint by January 5, 2010. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 12/15/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tkl) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
35
Consent Order granting substitution of attorney 29 . Added attorney James Dennis Menke for Fractional Villas, Inc. Attorney Henry Harmeling, IV terminated. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 11/24/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tkl) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER on joint 28 Motion for dismissal with prejudice as to plaintiff's fourth and fifth causes of action. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 11/13/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tkl) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 9 joint Motion to file first amended complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 8/6/09. (tkl) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
