Louis Gomez v. Larry Small
Petitioner: Louis Gomez
Respondent: Larry Small
Case Number: 3:2008cv02267
Filed: December 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Peter C. Lewis
Presiding Judge: Dana M. Sabraw
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge and (2) Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Court finds no basis for a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 9/13/10.(lao)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Louis Gomez v. Larry Small
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Louis Gomez
Represented By: Benjamin P Ramos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Larry Small
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?