Ausmus et al v. Lexington Insurance Company et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 15, 2009
ORDER Denying 15 Motion to Alter Order of Dismissal Vacate Judgment: Because plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate entitlement to reconsideration under any of the Rule 59(e) factors, their motion to vacate the judgment and alter the order of dismissal is DENIED. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 7/15/2009. (mjj)(jrl).
|April 22, 2009
ORDER Granting 2 Motion to Dismiss and Directing Entry of Judgment: The Court dismisses Plaintiffs complaint with prejudice. The Court concludes that Plaintiffs are unable to cure the deficiencies of their complaint and denies leave to amend. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Order. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 4/22/2009. (mjj)(kaj).
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?