Advanced Salon Visions, Inc. et al v. Lincoln Benefit Life Company et al

Plaintiff: Advanced Salon Visions, Inc., Mohsen Mokhtari and Advanced Salon Visions, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan
Defendant: Lincoln Benefit Life Company, Principle Life Insurance Company, Conseco Life Insurance Company, Niche Marketing, Inc., Clark Anderson, Fred L. Stephenson, Phillip D. Rowe, Does 1 through 100 and Niche Plan Sponsors, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2008cv02346
Filed: December 18, 2008
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Larry Alan Burns
Referring Judge: William McCurine
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 25, 2010 80 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 74 ; Plaintiffs claims for "Pre-Plan Negligent Misrepresentation" and "Pre-Plan Fraud and Deceit, Misrepresentation and Concealment" survive the motion to dismiss; the same can't b e said of Plaintiffs ERISA and fiduciary duty claims, which are dismissed with prejudice; Plaintiffs rescission claims are also dismissed with prejudice, though the Court will remain open to Plaintiffs seeking rescission as a form of equitable relief ; the Court warns the Plaintiffs again that the insurer defendants will be dismissed from this case absent richer factual proof that Anderson and Niche were acting as their agents when the alleged facts giving rise to this action transpired; Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 8/24/10. (kaj)
November 3, 2009 60 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Granting Plaintiffs' 58 Ex Parte Application for Leave to File a Motion to Reconsider: Plaintiffs have 14 calendar days from the date this order is entered to file a motion for reconsideration. Defendants will have another 14 calendar days from the date the motion is filed to file an opposition. The Court will take the motion under submission at that time. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 11/1/09. (pdc) (jrl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Advanced Salon Visions, Inc. et al v. Lincoln Benefit Life Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Advanced Salon Visions, Inc.
Represented By: Marc S Schechter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mohsen Mokhtari
Represented By: Marc S Schechter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Advanced Salon Visions, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan
Represented By: Marc S Schechter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lincoln Benefit Life Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Principle Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Conseco Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Niche Marketing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clark Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fred L. Stephenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phillip D. Rowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Niche Plan Sponsors, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?