Tobin et al v. BC Bancorp et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 24, 2010
ORDER (1) Granting in part and denying in part Defendant Deutsche Bank National Trust Company's Motion for Summary Judgment, (2) Granting in part and denying in part Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Motion for Summary Judgment and (3) Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment re 142 , 143 , 144 . Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 8/24/10. (lao)
|July 23, 2010
ORDER on 139 Joint dispute statement regarding Defendant Deutsche Bank National Trust' Company as Trustee for Alliance Bancorp Trust. Defendant IndyMac Federal Bank has been dismissed from the instant action and accordingly Plaintiffs' request for sanction or for an order to further compel a deposition against Defendant IndyMac is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 7/23/10. (lao)
|March 12, 2010
ORDER granting Defendants' Request for Second Deposition re 105 MOTION. To avoid any confusion on the matter, the Court orders Deutsche to provide a verified response that it is, in fact, holder of the note. This verified response must be prov ided on or before March 24, 2010. If Deutsche intends to claim that it is not in fact true holder of the note, Deutsche must notify the Court and Plaintiffs by March 17, 2010, and any limitations on Plaintiffs search will be reversed so that Plaintif fs may resume discovery calculated to reveal the true holder of their loan note. Defendants have until April 5, 2010 to provide supplemental responses, consistent with the orders of the Court as provided herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 3/12/10.(lao) (jrl).
|February 1, 2010
ORDER denying 86 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 2/1/10. (lao)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?