Tobin et al v. BC Bancorp et al
| Albert Tobin and Juliet Tobin |
| BC Bancorp, Alliance Bancorp, Wells Fargo Bank, Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Ndex West, LLC., J & J Lending, Robert S. Garner, Loni Hall and DOES |
| 3:2009cv00256 |
| February 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| San Diego |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Dana M. Sabraw |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1601 Truth in Lending |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
183
ORDER (1) Granting in part and denying in part Defendant Deutsche Bank National Trust Company's Motion for Summary Judgment, (2) Granting in part and denying in part Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Motion for Summary Judgment and (3) Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment re 142 , 143 , 144 . Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 8/24/10. (lao)
|
|
Filing
172
ORDER on 139 Joint dispute statement regarding Defendant Deutsche Bank National Trust' Company as Trustee for Alliance Bancorp Trust. Defendant IndyMac Federal Bank has been dismissed from the instant action and accordingly Plaintiffs' request for sanction or for an order to further compel a deposition against Defendant IndyMac is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 7/23/10. (lao)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER granting Defendants' Request for Second Deposition re 105 MOTION. To avoid any confusion on the matter, the Court orders Deutsche to provide a verified response that it is, in fact, holder of the note. This verified response must be prov ided on or before March 24, 2010. If Deutsche intends to claim that it is not in fact true holder of the note, Deutsche must notify the Court and Plaintiffs by March 17, 2010, and any limitations on Plaintiffs search will be reversed so that Plaintif fs may resume discovery calculated to reveal the true holder of their loan note. Defendants have until April 5, 2010 to provide supplemental responses, consistent with the orders of the Court as provided herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 3/12/10.(lao) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER denying 86 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 2/1/10. (lao)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
