Campion v. Old Republic Home Protection Company, Inc et al
| Douglas J Campion |
| Old Republic Home Protection Company, Inc and Does 1 - 25, Inclusive |
| 3:2009cv00748 |
| April 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Contract: Other Office |
| San Diego |
| Jan M. Adler |
| M. James Lorenz |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER granting 79 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 89 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File the First Amended Class action Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler on 3/23/12. (lao)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 58 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 58 Motion for Clarification. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler on 5/20/11. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER denying Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification and Defendant's Motion to Strike re 30 and 48 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler on 1/6/11. (lao)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER Denying (Doc. 36 ) Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend his Class Action Complaint. Defendant's Opposition to (Doc. [30}) Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification, shall be filed on or before August 6, 2010. Plaintiff's Reply shall be filed by August 27, 2010. A hearing will be held on September 21, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler on 7/7/2010. (cap)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
