Hayes v. Dovey et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 26, 2012
ORDER Granting Defendants' 79 Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 11/26/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)
|March 28, 2011
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motions to Dismiss re: 45 Motion to Dismiss, 49 Motion to Dismiss. The Court hereby grants Defendant Tilton's Motion to Dismiss for failure to state an Eighth Amendment claim. The C ourt denies Defendants Bourland and Janda's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against them for failing to state a claim. The Court denies Defendants Bourland, Janda, Giurbino and Woodford's Motion to Dismiss based o n qualified immunity. It is further ordered that Defendants Bourland, Janda, Giurbino and Woodford shall file an answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint within the time provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 3/28/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|April 22, 2010
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P.12(b)(6) re 16 , 23 . The Court hereby Grants Defendants Still, Dovey and Woodford's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff 39;s Eighth Amendment claims against them for failing to state a claim. The Court grants Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to either: (1) file and serve upon Defendants a First Amended Complaint which addresses ea ch deficiency of pleading identified in this Order; or (2) notify the Court and Defendants that he intends to proceed with this action as to the Eighth Amendment claims against Giurbino, Janda and Bourland only. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 4/22/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lao)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?