Runaj v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 30, 2009
ORDER granting Defendant Wells Fradgo Bank's 5 Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. Denying as moot Defendant Wells Fargo Bank's 6 Motion for More Definite Statement. Denying Plaintiff's 11 Motion to Remand to State Court. The Compla int is dismissed in its entirety w/o prejudice. Pla may file a First Amended Complaint by 10/23/2009. If Pla believes it is not necessary to take any actions required by Rule 17, she must show cause in writing by 10/23/2009. If Pla fails to comply w/ the Rule 17 requirements w/in the allotted time, Court will automatically dismiss the case w/ prejudice. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 9/30/2009. Case closed. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah). Modified on 10/1/2009 - Edited text. Regenerated NEF (jah). (kaj).
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?