Thomas v. Hernandez et al
Timothy Thomas |
R Hernandez, Roberts, Nelson and Irrazusta |
3:2009cv01336 |
June 19, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Larry Alan Burns |
Peter C. Lewis |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 ORDER granting defendants' 47 Motion to Dismiss. Thomas's § 1983 claims based on alleged violations of his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights are dismissed with prejudice. All claims against Warden Hernandez are dismissed with pr ejudice. Thomas's § 1983 claim based on a violation of his Eighth Amendment right, because he has failed to exhaust it, is dismissed without prejudice and without leave to amend. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/28/12. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj) |
Filing 37 ORDER denying motion for copies of documents. The magistrate judge's order is rescinded. Thomas' request for copies of documents in the case docket is denied. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 6/4/12. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj)(jrd) |
Filing 10 ORDER Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service of Amended Complaint Pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 4(c)(3) & 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 11/9/09. (IFP Package mailed to Plaintiff)(pdc) (jrl). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.