Ortega v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
Modesto Ortega |
Wells Fargo Bank, Primary Financial Services, LLC, First American Loanstar Trustee Services and Does |
3:2009cv01531 |
July 14, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
Imperial |
Jeffrey T. Miller |
Nita L. Stormes |
Plaintiff |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER granting 24 Defendant Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss the intentional misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, and TILA claims without leave to amend. Wells Fargo shall file an answer to Plaintiff's RESPA claim by June 11, 2010. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 5/11/2010. (tkl) |
Filing 22 ORDER signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 2/23/2010. The court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss. The court DENIES Ortega's motion for leave to amend with the proposed second amended complaint filed with his opposition. However, the court GRANTS Ortega leave to amend his complaint. (tkl) (jrl). |
Filing 20 ORDER granting 16 leave to file late opposition no later than January 22, 2010. Defendants shall file any reply no later than January 29, 2010. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 1/25/2010. (tkl)(jrl). |
Filing 12 ORDER denying as moot 7 Defendant Wells Fargo Bank's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 12/9/09. (tkl) (jrl). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.