Batey Largo v. City of National City et al
| Omar Anthony Batey Largo |
| City of National City, National City Police Department, Joshua Lineberg, Adolfo Gonzales and DOES |
| 3:2009cv01639 |
| July 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Roger T. Benitez |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
MINUTE ORDER: The date and time of the Settlement Conference on December 20, 2010 at 9:00 am is vacated and reset for February 10, 2011 at 9:00 am. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 12/1/2010.(knh)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER Granting 49 Rule 56(f) Continuance. The pending motion for summary judgment is continued to January 24, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 11/30/2010. (knh)
|
|
Filing
41
MINUTE ORDER: The date and time of the Settlement Conference on December 8, 2010 at 9:00 AM is vacated and reset for December 20, 2010 at 9:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 9/22/2010.(knh)
|
|
Filing
25
Minute ORDER: The date and time of the Settlement Conference on June 14, 2010 at 9:00 AM is vacated and reset for August 11, 2010 at 2:00 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 6/2/2010.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
