Lopez-Sanchez v. USA

Petitioner: Ruben Lopez-Sanchez
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 3:2009cv01768
Filed: August 12, 2009
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: John A. Houston
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 13, 2012 2 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Denying as Moot Petition to Vacate under 28 USC 2255. Because Petitioner has been released from custody, this Court finds Petitioner's § 2255 motion is moot. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that Petitioner's § 2255 motion is Denied as Moot. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 4/11/2012.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lopez-Sanchez v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ruben Lopez-Sanchez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?