Jones v. Cate
| Christopher Jones |
| Domingo Uribe, Jr. |
| 3:2009cv01896 |
| August 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Imperial |
| Jeffrey T. Miller |
| Louisa S Porter |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
183
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is Denied as to Claim Two and Granted as to Claim One.(sjt)
|
|
Filing
182
ORDER adopting 176 Report and Recommendation; Rejecting Respondent's Objections; Granting in Part the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 10/19/2020. (sjt)
|
|
Filing
176
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 141 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Christopher Jones. Any party having objections to the Courts proposed findings and recommendations shall serve and file specific written objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. party may respond to the other partys objections within 14 days after being served with a copy of the objections. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg on 1/21/2020.(sjt)
|
|
Filing
164
ORDER RE: Status Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block on 9/14/2018.(sjm)
|
|
Filing
160
SCHEDULING ORDER governing evidentiary hearing. Status Conference set for 10/16/2018 at 2:00pm. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block on 06/26/2018.(jpp)
|
|
Filing
156
ORDER setting Status Conference set for 6/12/2018 at 2:00pm. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block on 5/31/2018.(jpp)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, as Modified; Denying Objections; Issuing a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 9/25/2013.(knb)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER Adopting 50 Report and Recommendation in its entirety. In sum, the R & R is adopted in its entirety and 38 Motion to Amend is denied without prejudice, and 23 Motion to Dismiss is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 7/26/2011. (leh)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION in their entirety and this Court denies Respondent's motion to dismiss, with leave to amend. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 7/12/2010.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tkl)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER denying 3 without prejudice Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter on 9/29/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(tkl) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Cate | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Christopher Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Domingo Uribe, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Attorney General |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
