McKenzie v. Hernandez et al
| Alexander McKenzie |
| R Hernandez, H J Judd, Chu and John Doe #1 |
| 3:2009cv02631 |
| November 19, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Fresno |
| William V. Gallo |
| Marilyn L. Huff |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER Granting (Doc. 28 ) Motion to Dismiss. The Court Grants Defendants Hernandez and Choo's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's amended complaint. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 1/28/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (srm)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 6 Motion for a Court Order Directing the California Department of Corrections to Supply Plaintiff with Defendant H.J. Judd's Current Address of Employment and/or that the Attorney General's Offic e Supply Plaintiff with Judd's Address of Employment; and granting an extension of time to serve defendant Judd pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.4(m). Clerk of the Court is to provide a copy of: (1) the Court's December 21, 2009 Order [Doc. No. 3]; (2) this Order; (3) the Complaint, summons and a blank U.S. Marshal Form 285 to the Attorney General for purposes of re-attempting service as to Defendant Judd. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 2/23/2010. (IFP package to Attorney General)(cc USM)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knh) (kaj).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
