Barahona Estupinan v. United States of America

Petitioner: Jaime Barahona Estupinan
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 3:2010cv00190
Filed: January 25, 2010
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: William V. Gallo
Presiding Judge: Irma E. Gonzalez
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 9, 2010 6 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Court dismisses the 1 Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 4/9/2010. Case closed. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barahona Estupinan v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jaime Barahona Estupinan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?