Cordova v. Uribe et al
| Armando Samuel Cordova |
| Domingo Uribe, Jr. and Edmund G Brown, Jr |
| 3:2010cv00799 |
| April 13, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Imperial |
| Anthony J. Battaglia |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER Denying 33 Motion to Reconsider Denial of Certificate of Appealability; and Order Denying 34 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal. The motion to proceed IFP is therefore DENIED AS MOOT. For these reasons, and for the reasons set f orth in the Court's order of March 20, 2013 (Docket no. 30 ), the COA is DENIED, without prejudice to the Ninth Circuit's granting it. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 4/16/2013. (USCA Case Number 13-55608. Order electronically transmitted to US Court of Appeals. All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.)(akr)(jrd)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 20 . Plaintiff's objections to the Report and Recommendation are overruled. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and the petition is denied. Plaintiff's motions to expedite and to appoint counsel are denied as moot. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The Court denies a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/20/13. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
