Gardner v. GC Services, LP
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 2, 2012
ORDER granting 62 Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement; granting 63 Motion for Attorney Fees. Court certifies the proposed class. Class Counsel awarded litigation costs in the amount of $20,000, settlement administrative costs in the amount of $17,000 and attys fees in the amount of $292,500. Court grants the request for an enhancement award and awards Plaintiff Brooke Gardner a class representative enhancement award in the amount of $3,000. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 4/2/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|November 1, 2011
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 54 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement. Pla's request to have Plaintiff Brooke Gardner appointed class representative is granted. Pla's request for preliminary approval of the proposed settl ement is granted. Pla's request to have law firms of Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP, Weinhaus & Potashnick, Cochran Cherry Givens Smith Lane and Taylor, and Jacobs Law Office appointed as class coinsel is granted. The form and manner of giving notice of the proposed settlement to the class members is approved. Final Approval Hearing on the proposed settlement set for 3/26/2012 10:30 AM before Judge Irma E. Gonzalez. Pla shall file a motion for final approval of the settlement, as well as any motions for fees awards and enhancement awards by 2/27/2012. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 11/1/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
|July 6, 2010
ORDER denying Defendant's 2 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, Motion to Change Venue and 2 Motion to Stay. Plaintiff's 4 Motion to Remand to State Court is denied. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 7/6/2010. (jah)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?