Carter v. City of Carlsbad et al
| William Cody Carter |
| City of Carlsbad, Scott Meritt and Does 1 Through 10 |
| 3:2010cv01072 |
| May 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 6/30/2011. (jah)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion to Compel to Produce Documents. City of Carlsbad (City) is ordered to disclose the full conclusion section of the internal affairs report to Plaintiffs by 2/22/2011. The City is ordered to disclo se any records in its possession concerning the alleged excessive force by Officer Meritt or bearing on his credibility or truthfulness by 2/22/2011. Defendants shall provide by 2/24/2011, Plaintiff w/ log identifying each document responsive to Plai ntiff's Request for Production Nos. 2 and 3, except those the Court already ordered produce. Parties shall meet and confer regarding the log by 3/3/2011. If parties are unable to fully resolve their dispute, they shall concurrently file a brief regarding discoverability of the remaining documents by 3/11/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 2/15/2011. (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
