Averhart v. Alcazar et al
Markus Jerrell Averhart |
Hector Alcazar, Joe Martinez, Pat Shields and Julie Marie Haney |
3:2010cv01450 |
July 9, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Jan M. Adler |
Dana M. Sabraw |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER: (1) Denying 7 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice and (2) sua sponte granting Plaintiff an extension of time in which to file Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint must be received by the Court no later than Monday, October 25, 2010. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 9/7/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lao) |
Filing 5 ORDER: (1) Granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, imposing $12.20 initial partial filing fee and garnishing $337.80 balance from trust account 2 ; (2) Dismissing Complaint without prejudice for failing to state a claim and for seeki ng monetary damages against immune Defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) & 1915A(b); and (3) Denying Motion for Service 3 as Moot. Plaintiff is further Granted forty five (45) days leave from the date this Order is "Filed" in which to file a First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 8/10/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(copy of Order sent to Watch Commander, Vista Detention Facility)(1983 complaint form mailed to Plaintiff)(lao) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.