Thornton v. Neotti et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 3, 2011
ORDER Dismissing Second Amended Complaint Without Prejudice for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) & 1915A(b); because plaintiff has been provided two opportunities, but still has failed to sufficiently state a claim, the Court finds further amendment would be futile; the Clerk of Court is directed to close the file; Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 12/31/10.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj)
|August 24, 2010
ORDER granting plaintiff's 2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis; the Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, or his designee, shall collect from Plaintiffs prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the account in an amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of the preceding months income and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2); Plaintiffs Complaint is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(b) and 1915A(b). However, Plaintiff is granted forty five (45) days leave from the date this Order is Filed in which to file a First Amended Complaint. (Order electronically transmitted to Matthew Cate, Secretary CDCR). Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 8/20/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?