Bush v. Janda et al
| Anthony Arthur Bush |
| G Janda and Calipatria State Prison |
| 3:2010cv01825 |
| August 31, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Imperial |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER DISMISSING First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b). Plaintiff is granted forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is "Filed" in which to file a Second Amended Complaint which cures all the deficiencies. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 2/8/11.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service. Mailed a form § 1983 complaint to Plaintiff.)(jer)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER (1) Granting 5 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Imposing no Initial Partial Filing Fee, Garnishing $350 from Prisoner's Trust Account; and (2) Sua Sponte Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim and for Seeking Monetary Damages Against Immune Defendants Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b). Plaintiff is granted forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is "filed" in which to file a First Amended Complaint. (Order electronically transmitted to Matthew Cate, Secretary CDCR) Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 12/15/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
