Craigie v. Gomez et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 13, 2011
ORDER Sua Sponte Dismissing First Amended Complaint for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) & 1915A(b). It is hereby ordered that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is Dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(b) and § 1915A(b). Because the Court finds amendment of Plaintiff's § 1983 claims would be futile at this time, leave to amend is Denied. It is further certified that an IFP appeal from this Order would not be taken "in good faith" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 4/13/2011.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|December 29, 2010
ORDER: Granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and Sua Sponte Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim. It is hereby ordered that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP is granted. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on Matthew Cate. It is further ordered that Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted 30 days leave from the date this order is filed in which to file a First Amended Complaint. (Order electronically transmitted to Matthew Cate, Secretary CDCR). Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 12/29/2010. (1983 Form Mailed to Plaintiff) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?