Lomax v. Canlas et al
| Peter Romero Lomax |
| Tyler, Robert J Hernandez, Silva,, Farinas, John Lubisich, K L Hawthorne, Canlas, Matthew Kate, N Grannis, E Franklin, Choo, Jayasundara, Medical Authorization Review Committee, Whitehead, Lehv, E Romero and G Cassesi |
| 3:2010cv02226 |
| October 26, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William Q. Hayes |
| William McCurine |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety. (Doc. 91 ). The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. (Doc. 73 ). Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Lehv are dismissed without leave to amend. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 5/22/2013. (Pro se plaintiff was electronically served.) (mdc)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 62 ) is ADOPTED in its entirety. The Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Lubisich (Doc. 54 ) is GRANTED without leave to amend. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 9/4/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 43 ) is adopted in its entirety. The Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Jayasundra, Franklin, Romero, Grannis, Cate, and Hernandez is granted with leave to amend. The Motion to Dis miss Plaintiff's claim for monetary damages against all defendants in their official capacities is granted with prejudice. No later than 60 days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within 60 days from the date of this Order, this case shall proceed as to the claims in the Complaint which remain after this Order. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 2/9/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER Granting In Part And Denying In Part Plaintiff's Motion For Order To Compel (Re Doc. 31 ): The Court denies Plaintiff's request to find the Defendants in contempt. The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to compel and orders Defenda nts' counsel to provide the forwarding address for Defendants Cate, Lehv, Farinas, Grannis, Hawthorne, Lubisich, and Cassesi to the U.S. Marshal in a confidential memorandum indicating that the summons and complaint is to be delivered to that ad dress. The Defendants' counsel shall provide the U.S. Marshal with any such information on or before 12/30/2011. Within 45 days of receipt of any available address from the Defendants' counsel, the Court orders the U.S. Marshal to serve a c opy of Plaintiff's Complaint and summons upon defendants Cate, Lehv, Farinas, Grannis, Hawthorne, Lubisich, and Cassesi. The Clerk of the Court provide a copy of: (1) the Court's 12/07/2010 Service Order (Doc. 4 ); (2) this Order; (3) the Complaint, summons and a blank U.S. Marshal Form 285 to Defendants' counsel for purposes of reattempting service as to Cate, Lehv, Farinas, Grannis, Hawthorne, Lubisich, and Cassesi. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 12/15/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; package of documents, as directed by this Order, was mailed to defendants' attorneys.) (mdc)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER (1) Granting Plaintiff's Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Imposing No Initial Partial Filing Fee And Garnishing Balance From Prisoner's Trust Account Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a); And (2) Directing U.S. Marshal To Effect Service Of Complaint Pursuant To Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3 And 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(d). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 12/7/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; Order electronically transmitted to Matthew Cate, Secretary CDCR; IFP package prepared.) (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
