Diparra v. Bennet et al
| Jose Luis Diparra |
| Bennet, ., Matthew Cate, Thomas Hoffman, Matthew Cole, Joe Doe, Matthew Mattox, Steve Lamirand, Elsa Ezequiel, Robert Hernandez, . and Rositas |
| 3:2010cv02454 |
| November 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Bernardino |
| William V. Gallo |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
CLERK'S JUDGMENT IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the First Amended Complaint is Dismissed without Prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(b) and § 1915A(b). (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER: (1) Granting Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Assessing No Initial Partial Filing Fee and Garnishing $350 Balance From Prisoner's Trust Account; and (2) Sua Sponte Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28USC§ 1915(e)(2)(B) & § 1915A(b). Plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint on or before April 1, 2011. Failure to file an amended complaint by April 1, 2011 will result in final judgment of dismissal without prejudice in this case. (Order electronically transmitted to Matthew Cate, Secretary CDCR). Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 3/9/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
