Garcia et al v. Progressive Choice Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Christina Elizabeth Palmer Geraci and Jesus Antonio Garcia
Defendant: Progressive Choice Insurance Company and DOES
Case Number: 3:2011cv00466
Filed: March 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Roger T. Benitez
Presiding Judge: Nita L. Stormes
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 79 Motion to Strike Defendant's Answer. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 12/18/2013. (knb)(jrd)
September 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER Denying 37 Motion to Modify/Set Aside Magistrate Judge's July 30, 2012 Order, or Alternatively, for Certification of Order for Interlocutory Appellate Review and Stay of Order. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 9/26/2012. (knb)
July 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER Determining the Parties' Joint Motion for Determination of a Discovery Dispute and Granting Plaintiff's Request for Production (Doc. No. 30 ). Defendant is to produce the documents identified as Item Nos. 1-109 on its amended privilege log to Plaintiff's counsel within seven days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 7/30/2012. (knb)
August 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER Determining Parties' Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute, Denying in Part and Granting in Part Plaintiff's Motion to Quash and Granting Plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order (Doc. No. 11 ). Subpoena number 9 is quashed; and with regard to all other subpoenas and the information sought therein, the parties shall submit a joint motion for entry of a protective order and a proposed order no later than September 1, 2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 8/24/2011. (knb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garcia et al v. Progressive Choice Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Elizabeth Palmer Geraci
Represented By: Stephen G Recordon
Represented By: Robert Kennedy Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesus Antonio Garcia
Represented By: Robert Kennedy Scott
Represented By: Stephen G Recordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progressive Choice Insurance Company
Represented By: Patrick M. Howe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?