Baker v. Ensign
Cameron Baker |
Jason Ensign |
Jason Ensign |
Cameron Baker |
San Diego, City of, William Landsdowne, David Spitzer, Elite Show Services, Inc., Parham Hirari-Moghaddam, Joel Brase, Jason Biggers, Sifakis, DOES, Tyler Wenbourne and Mathew Keasler |
3:2011cv02060 |
September 6, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
William V. Gallo |
John A. Houston |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 196 ORDER denying Cameron Baker's 180 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs; denying Jason Ensign's 188 Motion to Re-Tax Costs. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 5/4/2016. (jah) |
Filing 176 ORDER granting Third-Party Defendants City of San Diego, William Lansdowne, and David Spitzer's 157 Motion for Summary Judgment. Court sustains City Defendant's objection. strikes Third-Party Plaintiff Jason Ensign's opposition brief 165 pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(7), and grants City Defendants' motion for summary judgment in its entirety. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 9/22/2015. (jah) |
Filing 148 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Mr. Ensign's Motions to Strike Affirmative Defenses (Re ECF Nos. 117 , 118 ). The Court grants Mr. Baker and the City Defendants leave to file an amended answer in order to revise any affirmative defenses so that they are consistent with this order. If they choose to do so, Mr. Baker and the City Defendants must file their amended answer no later than 9/8/2014. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 8/20/2014. (cxl) |
Filing 147 ORDER denying Defendant Ensign's 95 Ex Parte Motion for Reconsideration of Magistrate's Ruling on Depositions, 116 Ex Parte Motion for Reconsideration re 98 Joint Statement Hearing, and 128 Ex Parte Motion to Shorten Time to File Rule 72(a) Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 8/14/2014. (jah) |
Filing 51 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 26 Motion to Dismiss filed by the City of San Diego, Lansdowne, and Spitzer. The motion is Granted as to the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment claims against Spitzer. The claims are dismissed with out prejudice. To the extent the state law claims are asserted against Movants, the motion is Granted as to the state law claims. The state law claims are dismissed with prejudice. The motion is Denied as to the remaining claims. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 3/20/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.