Goodrum v. Hoshino
Petitioner: Tony Goodrum
Respondent: Timothy E. Busby
Case Number: 3:2011cv02262
Filed: September 23, 2011
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Jan M. Adler
Presiding Judge: Irma E. Gonzalez
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER: (1) Adopting re 91 Report and Recommendation; (2) Denying the Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (3) Denying Certificate of Appealability. The Court OVERRULES Petitioners objections, (Doc. No. 96), ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety, (Doc. No. 91), DENIES Petitioners Second Amended Petition, (Doc. No. 75), and DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 09/30/19. (mme)
February 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER: (1) Granting in Part and Denying in Part 48 Motion for Certificate of Appealability; (2) Denying 46 Motion for Extension of Time to File Appeal as Moot; and (3) Denying 44 Motion for Certificate of Appealability as Moot. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 2/8/2013. (USCA Case Number 13-55010. Order electronically transmitted to US Court of Appeals. All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (akr)
October 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER denying Petitioner 35 Amended Motion to Set Aside Judgment. Court finds Petitioner has failed to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances exist entitling him to relief and denies the Motion for Relief from Judgment pursuant to 60(b). Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 10/23/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
June 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER denying Petitioner's 5 Motion for Discovery Concerning Law Enforcement Officers. Court finds that Petitioner has failed to satisfy the requirements of 28 USC 2244(b)(2)(B) for proceeding in this Court with claims raised in a second or s uccessive petition. Court dismisses the current Petition with prejudice and without leave to amend, denies Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing, and denies Petitioner's request for discovery of law enforcement personnel files. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 6/13/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goodrum v. Hoshino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tony Goodrum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Timothy E. Busby
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?