Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company v. California Finest Oil et al
| Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company |
| California Finest Oil, Raad Attisha, Hossom Theweny and Nazar Theweny |
| 3:2012cv01312 |
| May 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Roger T. Benitez |
| William V. Gallo |
| Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 101 Motion to Enforce Settlement; Granting Plaintiff's Request for Attorneys' Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 8/15/2016. (knb)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice 70 Plaintiff's Motion to File Documents Under Seal. Plaintiff shall have until January 22, 2014, to file a renewed motion to seal. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 1/16/2014. (srm)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Denying 30 Parties' Joint Motion/Stipulation to Extend Discovery Cut-Off and Related Pretrial Deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 2/6/2013. (srm)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice 9 Plaintiff's Motion for Writ of Attachment and Right To Attach Order Against Defendant California Finest Oil. The Court grants Plaintiff ten (10) days to refile it's motion. Upon refiling the motion, the Court will take the matter under submission without a hearing. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 2/4/2013. (NEF regenerated.)(srm)(jrd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
