Park v. Webloyalty.com, Inc. et al
| Kevin Park |
| Webloyalty.com, Inc. and DOES 1 through 50 |
| 3:2012cv01380 |
| June 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jan M. Adler |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The joint motion to dismiss (Docket no. 136 ) is granted. All claims by the named Plaintiff, Kevin Park, are dismissed with prejudice. No class was certified, but to the extent dismissal of the putative class members' claims is required, those are dismissed without prejudice. The parties will each bear their own costs and attorney's fees. All pending motions are denied as moot and all pending dates are vacated. The Clerk is directed to close the docket. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 6/6/2019. (jdt)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER Denying 102 Motion for Class Certification. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/15/2019. (jdt)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 87 Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler on 4/30/2018. (jdt)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER Summarily Denying 70 Motion to Dismiss. This ruling is not intended as a prediction of how the Court might rule on other issues such as class certification, Park's appointment as class representative, or any other issue not raised in Webloyalty's motion. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 09/22/2017. (ajs)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying 38 Motion for Leave to Amend, and ORDER of Dismissal. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Park's federal claims, and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to his state law claims and the putative class's claims. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 6/19/15. (kas)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER Granting in Part Motion to Dismiss 28 . The unopposed motion for leave to file excessive pages 27 is granted, and the motion to dismiss is accepted as filed. The Second Amended Complaint is dismissed, but without prejudice and not with preju dice as requested in the motion. Plaintiff may not amend unless he first obtains leave to do so. He may seek leave to amend by filing an ex parte motion showing that amendment would not be futile. The ex parte motion must be filed within 28 days from the date this order is entered; if it is not, the Court will assume Plaintiff realizes he cannot successfully amend, and the complaint will be dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiff's claims, and without prejudice as to the putative class claims. If Plaintiff moves for leave to amend, Defendant may file a response within 14 calendar days. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/29/14. (kas)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER dismissing complaint for failure to plead jurisdictional facts and denying as moot 13 Motion to Dismiss. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend. No later than September 30, 2013, plaintiff may file an amended complaint. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 8/28/13. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
