Salvador v. Hansberg

Salvador v. Hansberg

Plaintiff:	Amina Salvador
Defendant:	Hansberg
Case Number:	3:2012cv01746
Filed:	July 13, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Diego
Presiding Judge:	David H. Bartick
Presiding Judge:	William Q. Hayes
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 5, 2012	Filing 9 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion For Extension Of Time To Amend (Re Doc. 8 ): Plaintiff's Amended Complaint must be received by the Court no later than 10/29/2012. If Plaintiff elects not to file an Amended Complaint by 10/29/2012, this c ase shall remain dismissed as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) without any further Order of the Court. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 9/5/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)
August 7, 2012	Filing 5 ORDER: (1) Granting Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Re Doc. 2 ); (2) Denying Motion To Appoint Counsel (Re Doc. 3 ); And (3) Sua Sponte Dismissing Complaint For Failing To State A Claim And As Frivolous: Plaintiff is GRANTED 45 days leave from the date this Order is filed in which to file a First Amended Complaint which cures the deficiencies of pleading noted. If Plaintiff fails to file an Amended Complaint within 45 days, this case shall remain dismissed for failing to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 8/6/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 5, 2012

Filing 9 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion For Extension Of Time To Amend (Re Doc. 8 ): Plaintiff's Amended Complaint must be received by the Court no later than 10/29/2012. If Plaintiff elects not to file an Amended Complaint by 10/29/2012, this c ase shall remain dismissed as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) without any further Order of the Court. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 9/5/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)

August 7, 2012

Filing 5 ORDER: (1) Granting Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Re Doc. 2 ); (2) Denying Motion To Appoint Counsel (Re Doc. 3 ); And (3) Sua Sponte Dismissing Complaint For Failing To State A Claim And As Frivolous: Plaintiff is GRANTED 45 days leave from the date this Order is filed in which to file a First Amended Complaint which cures the deficiencies of pleading noted. If Plaintiff fails to file an Amended Complaint within 45 days, this case shall remain dismissed for failing to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 8/6/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Salvador v. Hansberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amina Salvador
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Hansberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?