Mirkarimi v. Nevada Property 1 LLC et al
| Sasan Mirkarimi |
| Nevada Property 1 LLC and Does 1-50 |
| 3:2012cv02160 |
| August 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| David H. Bartick |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Litigation Expenses and Class Representative Enhancement. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 2/29/2016.(rlu)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER Granting with Modification Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement and Providing for Notice. (ECF # 110 ). The parties are Ordered to carry out the Settlement Agreement, in the manner provided in this Order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 8/24/2015. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER Resolving 78 Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute. It is Ordered that the temporary stay on communications with putative class members is lifted. It is further Ordered that before Plaintiff may mail any questionnaire to the putative class members, Plaintiff must submit the proposed questionnaire to the Court for an in camera review. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 11/21/14. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Discovery Orders. It is Ordered that Plaintiff's motion for leave to conduct additional discovery is Granted, in part. Plaintiff may take up to 5 additional depositions. Plaintiff may also propound up to 15 additional interrogatories. Defendant shall respond to the interrogatories within 15 days from the date of service of the interrogatories. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 11/18/14.(rlu)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER Regarding 75 Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute. It is Ordered that Plaintiff's motion to compel is Granted. Defendant shall produce all documents responsive to Plaintiff's outstanding Requests for Production for wh ich Defendant agreed to produce documents, including RFP Nos. 5, 18-20, 35, 36, 44, 47, 48, 50, 122-124, 128, and 133-136, and shall provide supplemental responses to Interrogatories Nos. 17 and 25, and RFP No. 128 on or before October 31, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 10/22/2014. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER Denying as moot Defendant's 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Denying 15 Motion to Dismiss; and Denying 15 Motion to strike class action allegations without prejudice. Defendant has twenty (20) days from the filing of this order to answer Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/15/2013. (rlu)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
