Shenzhen Fenda Technology Co. LTD v. Altec Lansing, LLC
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 14, 2014
ORDER: (1) Denying 87 Plaintiff's Motion to File Documents Under Seal Without Prejudice; (2) Denying 88 , 90 , 92 Defendants' Motion to File Documents Under Seal Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 1/14/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|November 21, 2013
ORDER Granting Defendant Prophet Equity, LP's Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff Shenzhen Fenda Technologies' Fraud And Negligent Misrepresentation Claims Against Defendant Prophet Equity, LP (Re Doc. 52 ): Fenda is granted leave to amend only it s claims for fraud and negligent misrepresentation as asserted against Prophet Equity. Fenda's request to add claims for breach of fiduciary duty is denied. If Plaintiff wishes to file a third amended complaint, Plaintiff shall do so on or befor e 12/13/2013. The hearing on Prophet Equity's Motion to Dismiss, currently set for 11/22/2013, is vacated. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 11/21/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; ECF registration requirement notices also were mailed to Attys Thomas Yuhao Lai and Shiyong Ye.) (mdc)
|July 15, 2013
ORDER Denying 45 Defendant Altec Lansing, LLC's Ex Parte Motion to Strike 42 Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 7/15/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?