Thermolife International, LLC v. Myogenix Corp. et al
| Thermolife International, LLC |
| Myogenix Corp., GNC Corporation, General Nutrition Centers, Inc. and General Nutrition Corporation |
| 3:2013cv00651 |
| March 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Mitchell D. Dembin |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
335
ORDER (1) Denying Thermolife's Request for a Stay of Judgment Without Bond; (2) Granting Plaintiffs a Temporary Stay. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 2/21/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
|
Filing
316
ORDER Granting Defendants' Applications for Attorneys' Fees. The Court awards Vital: $387,813.14. This does not include pre-judgment or post-judgment interest. The Court awards Hi-Tech $867,814.59. This does not include pre-judgment or post-judgment interest. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 1/8/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
|
Filing
315
ORDER: (1) Granting Defendant's 292 Motion to Strike; and (2) Denying Plaintiffs' 288 289 Motion for Reconsideration. The Court strikes the portions of the Declaration of Tyler Woods, (ECF No. 288-2), and the exhibits that were not pr esented to the Court prior to the present Motion (paragraph 2-4 (Exhibits A-C); and paragraph 6-16 (Exhibits E-O).) The Court also strikes all portions of Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration (ECF Nos. 288, 289) which rely on or reference these exhibits. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/23/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mpl)
|
|
Filing
282
ORDER (1) Striking Plaintiffs' Late-Filed Declaration And (2) Granting Defendants' 246 , 253 Motion for Attorney Fees. It is ordered that the Court concludes that under the totality of the circumstances defendants have shown that this case is exceptional such that an award of attorney fees is justified. In particular, plaintiffs' pre-filing investigation was severely lacking, thus resulting in frivolous claims and the objective unreasonableness of certain infringement con tentions; plaintiffs' motivation was seemingly to extract nuisance-value settlements from a large number of defendants; and awarding fees here will advance compensation- and deterrence- oriented goals. The Court therefore grants defendants' motions for attorney fees. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/4/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj)
|
|
Filing
242
Memorandum Decision and ORDER Finding (1) Certain Claims Invalid as Anticipated; and (2) Certain Claims Invalid as Obvious. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 9/21/2016.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kcm)
|
|
Filing
224
ORDER (1) granting in part and denying in part 209 Plaintiff's Motion In Limine and (2) denying 210 Defendant's Motion In Limine/Daubert Motion. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 7/22/2016.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kcm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
