Lawrence et al v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
| Randall Lawrence and Michael McConnell |
| United States Department of the Treasury, United States Bureau of the Mint and United States of America |
| 3:2014cv00594 |
| March 14, 2014 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss FAC is denied. (Doc. 19 ). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 3/26/2015. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER: The Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint is granted. (Doc. 11 ). Plaintiff shall file the proposed first amended complaint attached to the motion within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 12/8/2014. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss is granted. (Doc. 3 ). The Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. No later than thirty (30) days after the date this Order is filed, Plaintiffs may file a motion for leave to amend the Complaint, accompanied by a proposed first amended complaint. If Plaintiffs fail to file a motion for leave to amend the Complaint, this case shall remain closed without further order of the Court. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 7/23/2014. (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
