Arellano v. Ojeda et al
| Raul Arellano |
| E. Ojeda, Helmick, D. Mack and Unknown Officer |
| 3:2014cv02401 |
| October 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Michael M. Anello |
| Jill L. Burkhardt |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
ORDER Denying 123 Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment under Rule 59(e). The Court has carefully reviewed the entire record of this case and exhaustively reconsidered its previous rulings. The Court is satisfied that it did not commit a ny error. Defendants Mack and Helmick are entitled to qualified immunity from suit and judgment in their favor. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to provide Plaintiff with a blank Notice of Appeal (Civil) form. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 4/23/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service and Plaintiff mailed blank Notice of Appeal (Civil).) (tcf)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER Denying 113 Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case without Prejudice. The Court will consider the arguments raised therein when ruling via separate written order on Plaintiff's request for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e). Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 1/7/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER Granting 101 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Qualified Immunity; Denying 103 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike. The Court GRANTS Defendants' motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 12/2/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tcf)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER Denying 90 Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension of Time or in the Alternative for Reconsideration. The Court denies Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of its previous order and entry of judgment in favor of Defendants. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to provide Plaintiff with a blank Notice of Appeal (Civil) form. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 4/27/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Blank civil Notice of Appeal form mailed)(rmc)
|
|
Filing
88
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. The Court grants Defendants' motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER Denying 63 Plaintiff's Motion. Plaintiff's motion seeking an order appointing an expert witness is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 2/26/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER Denying Defendants' 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 4/25/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
