Fundingsland v. OMH Healthedge Holdings Inc. et al
Plaintiff: John Fundingsland
Defendant: OMH Healthedge Holdings Inc. and DOES 1 through 10
Case Number: 3:2015cv01053
Filed: May 11, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Orange
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Bashant
Presiding Judge: William V. Gallo
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER granting Defendant OMH Healthedge Holdings, Inc.'s 47 Motion for Summary Judgment. Court grants summary judgment in favor of Defendant on Plaintiff's remaining claims for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 7/18/2018. (jah)
March 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER: (1) Granting Motion to File Documents Under Seal (ECF No. 48 ) and (2) denying Motion to File Documents Under Sea; (ECF No. 51 ). Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 3/27/2018. (jjg) (sjt).
October 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant OMH Healthedge Holdings, Inc.'s 18 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Court denies the motion to dismiss Count 1 and 2. Court grants the motion to dismiss Count 3. Plaintiff is given leave to amend Count 3. If Plaintiff chooses to file a Second Amended Complaint, it must filed by 11/11/2016. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 10/21/2016. (jah)
May 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant OMH Healthedge Holdings, Inc.'s 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and 8 Motion to Strike Jury Trial Demand. Court grants Dft's motion to dismiss Pla's Complaint. Pla is given leave to amend all of his claims. If Plaintiff chooses to file a First Amended Complaint, it must be filed by 6/24/2016. Court denies without prejudice Dft's request to strike Pla's jury trial demand. Dft may renew its request once parties have completed discovery. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 5/25/2016. (jah). Modified on 5/26/2016 - Case not closed per Chambers (jah).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fundingsland v. OMH Healthedge Holdings Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Fundingsland
Represented By: James G. O'Callahan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OMH Healthedge Holdings Inc.
Represented By: Lindsay Jane Mertens
Represented By: Charles W Pugh
Represented By: Rob R. Remington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?