United States of America v. Paulson et al
United States of America |
John Michael Paulson, James D. Paulson, Vikki E. Paulson, Crystal Christensen and Madeleine Pickens |
3:2015cv02057 |
September 16, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Anthony J. Battaglia |
Nita L. Stormes |
Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 181 ORDER Denying 174 Defendants' Ex Parte Application for Reconsideration of the Court's Order Granting Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 11/13/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc) |
Filing 172 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 98 Ms. Pickens Motion for Summary Judgment against Plaintiff; granting in part and denying in part 111 Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment against Michael Paulson; denying 114 Plaintiffs Cross-Mo tion for Summary Judgment Ms. Pickens; denying 118 Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment against James Paulson; denying 119 Michael Paulsons Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 121 Michael Paulsons Motion for Summary Judgment against Ms. Pickens; denying 122 Michael Paulsons Motion for Summary Judgment against Co-Trustees; granting in part and denying in part 123 Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment against Co-Trustees; denying 143 and 153 Motions to Strike. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 9/7/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc) |
Filing 171 ORDER denying 103 Defendants Vikki E. Paulson and Crystal Christensen's Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 8/22/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc) |
Filing 82 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 77 Motion to Dismiss Cross-Claims. The Court GRANTS Cross Defendants' motion to dismiss Ms. Pickens's claims for breach of fiduciary duty WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and DENIES Cross Defendants' mot ion to dismiss Ms. Pickens's claim for indemnity. If Ms. Pickens may plausibly allege additional facts to cure the deficiencies noted herein, she may file a second amended cross-claim within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. Cross De fendants are otherwise ordered to file an answer to the cross-claim, as applicable, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order or within fourteen (14) days of a second amended cross-claim being filed, whichever is later. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 4/11/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc) |
Filing 75 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 63 Cross Defendants Motion to Dismiss. The Court GRANTS Cross-defendants'request for judicial notice and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Crossdefendants' motion to dismiss Ms. Pickens's c ross-claim. Additionally, finding that amendment would not be futile or prejudicial, the Court will allow Ms. Pickens leave to amend. Thus, if Ms. Pickens may plausibly allege additional facts to cure the deficiencies noted herein, she may file an am ended cross-claim within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. Cross-defendants are otherwise ordered to file an answer to the cross-claim, as applicable, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order or within fourteen (14) days of an amended cross-claim being filed, whichever is later. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 1/4/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc) |
Filing 54 ORDER: (1) Granting in Part and Denying in Part 15 Madeleine Pickens' Motion to Dismiss; (2) Granting in Part and Denying in Part 19 Vikki Paulson and Crystal Christensen's Motion to Dismiss; (3) Denying 36 James Paulson's Motion to Dismiss; (4) Denying 40 Madeleine Pickens' Motion to Dismiss Cross-Claim; and (5) Denying 44 Vikki Paulson and Crystal Christensen's Motion to Dismiss Cross-Claim. If Plaintiff may plausibly allege additional facts to cure the defi ciencies noted herein, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint only as to the dismissed claims within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. Defendants are otherwise ordered to file an answer to the complaint or cross-claim, as applicable, within fourteen (14) days of this order or within fourteen (14) days of an amended complaint being filed, whichever is later. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 9/6/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dls) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.