BofI Federal Bank v. Erhart et al
| BofI Federal Bank |
| Charles Matthew Erhart and Does 1-25 |
| 3:2015cv02353 |
| October 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1030 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER granting 75 Motion to Quash BofI's Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 3/2/2017. (fth)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER denying Plaintiff Bofl Federal Bank's 18 Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Court dissolves the temporary restraining order 10 and the supplemental temporary restraining order 17 . Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 9/7/2016. (jah)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER Determining 54 Joint Motion for Discovery Dispute No. 3. Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff's Motion to compel production of the documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 8/5/2016. (jah)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER granting 39 Joint Motion for Discovery Dispute No. 1; granting Plaintiff's 43 Motion to Compel Responses to the Subpoena. Court orders that by 5/10/2016, Carol Gillam must produce to Bofl all documents in her possession, custody and control that respond to each of the requests in the subpoena. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 4/26/2016. (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
