Adeleye et al v. County of San Diego et al
Matthew Adeleye and J.H. |
San Diego, City of, San Diego, County of, S.D. Health and Human Services, Daisy Gudino, Jose Padilla, Madeline Garcia, Shelly Paule, Amy (last name unkown) and DOES 1 Through 100 |
3:2016cv00234 |
January 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Ruben B. Brooks |
Larry Alan Burns |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER denying without prejudice 10 Motion to Appoint Counsel, granting 12 Motion to Dismiss City of San Diego, and ordering Adeleye to provide a current address. The claims against the City of San Diego are dismissed with leave to amend. Adeley e and J.H. choose to file an amended complaint to assert claims against the City, they must do so by October 17, 2016. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.11(b), the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice if Adeleye doesn't notify the Court and all parties of his current address by November 21, 2016. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/14/16. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kas) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, precluding Adeleye from acting as guardian ad litem for J.H., and addressing the minor's need for counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 2/24/16. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kas) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.