Charter Township of Clinton Police and Fire Retirement System v. LPL Financial Holdings Inc. et al
| Charter Township of Clinton Police and Fire Retirement System |
| LPL Financial Holdings Inc., Mark S. Casady and Matthew J. Audette |
| 3:2016cv00685 |
| March 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0078 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Dismissing Consolidated Complaint for Violation of Federal Securities Laws with Leave to Amend (ECF No. 17 ). Plaintiff shall have 45 days from the date this order is signed in which to file an amended complaint. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 8/18/2017. (mxn)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER Granting 10 Motion for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and Approval of Selection of Lead Counsel. The Court Grants the Retirement Fund's motion to be appointed Lead Plaintiff. The Court appoints Soft Drink and Brewery Workers Union Local 812 Retirement Fund as Lead Plaintiff in this class action. The Court also Grants the Retirement Fund's motion for approval of lead counsel and appoints Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP as Lead Counsel. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/21/2016. (rlu)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
