Dennis v. Ralph Lauren Corporation et al
| Courtney Dennis |
| Ralph Lauren Corporation, Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. and DOES |
| 3:2016cv01056 |
| May 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER: The motion to dismiss (Dkt # 42 ) filed by Defendants is granted in part and denied in part. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 8/29/2017. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER: The motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (Dkt # 28 ) is granted. No later than fourteen (14) days from the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff may file the proposed second amended complaint which is attached to the motion. If Plaintiff does not file the second amended complaint within fourteen (14) days, the Court will order the Clerk of Court to close the case. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 4/12/2017. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER: Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt # 20 ) is granted in its entirety. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is dismissed. (Dkt # 13 ). Plaintiff shall file any motion for leave to file a second amended complaint on or before 1/17/2017. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 12/20/2016. (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
